Fisher Technique: Critical Reading
Revision as of 00:55, 16 June 2021 by Mmusij (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Research:ArticlesCategory:ResearchCategory:Critical Reading Below is a technique based upon a systematic set of procedures to help evaluate a journal arti...")
Below is a technique based upon a systematic set of procedures to help evaluate a journal article argument. The approach involves reading through the text and annotating interim or main conclusions derived from joint or independent reasons.
Approach
- Read through the text first to get a basic understanding of the premise and the structure
- Read through again circling inference indicators such as thus or therefore etc.
- Underline any conclusions and place reasons inside
< >
brackets - Try to summarise the argument and if cannot then list the key points
- Highlight interim or main conclusions with C. Typical indicators are thus, therefore, hence, consequently etc.
- Ask why are you being asked to accept the main conclusion. Typical indicators are because, since, it follows etc.
- Rank the primary and secondary reasons with R
- Draw a simple argument diagram
Argument Structure
An argument structure example, below extract from [1]:
R1 + R2 = (therefore) C [For joint reasons]
R1 or R2 = (therefore) C [For independent reasons]
Conclusions
Interim and main conclusions example, below extract from [1]:
R1 + R2 = (therefore) C1 (interim conclusion)
C1 + R3 = (therefore) C2 (main conclusion)
References
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd edition.). SAGE Publications.