<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://agileme.wiki/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Socratic_Questions%3A_Critical_Evaluation</id>
	<title>Socratic Questions: Critical Evaluation - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://agileme.wiki/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Socratic_Questions%3A_Critical_Evaluation"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://agileme.wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Socratic_Questions:_Critical_Evaluation&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-11T19:36:55Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.38.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://agileme.wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Socratic_Questions:_Critical_Evaluation&amp;diff=1346&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Mmusij: Created page with &quot;Category:Research:ArticlesCategory:ResearchCategory:Research:Critical Evaluation Here are some socratic questions when evaluating an argument in a journal article:...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://agileme.wiki/wiki/index.php?title=Socratic_Questions:_Critical_Evaluation&amp;diff=1346&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-06-16T00:56:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Category:Research:Articles&quot; title=&quot;Category:Research:Articles&quot;&gt;Category:Research:Articles&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Category:Research&quot; title=&quot;Category:Research&quot;&gt;Category:Research&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Category:Research:Critical_Evaluation&quot; title=&quot;Category:Research:Critical Evaluation&quot;&gt;Category:Research:Critical Evaluation&lt;/a&gt; Here are some socratic questions when evaluating an argument in a journal article:...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Research:Articles]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research:Critical Evaluation]]&lt;br /&gt;
Here are some socratic questions when evaluating an argument in a journal article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What sources agree and why?&lt;br /&gt;
* Why is this work significant?&lt;br /&gt;
* How does this work contribute to the field?&lt;br /&gt;
* What are an alternative explanations for the phenomena observed?&lt;br /&gt;
* How did we arrive at the conclusions?&lt;br /&gt;
* Why does the author believe that the conclusions are correct?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the source information?&lt;br /&gt;
* What assumptions have been made?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is missing from the article?&lt;br /&gt;
* What happens if the conclusions are incorrect?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is my bias as a reader?&lt;br /&gt;
* What is my perception used to create my perspective?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
# Hart, C. (2018). ''Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd edition.)''. SAGE Publications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fisher Technique: Critical Reading]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mmusij</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>